Man, what am I missing here? I love this flick, a really fun and entertaining film. I have the SDVD and the transfer, while not perfect, isn't half bad in my opinion. Then I got the HD DVD version and I think it is an incredible looking disc and about as far from being "horrid" as it can be. I mean c'mon now, "horrid"? Really? As soon as I saw this topic and i read the first couple of posts, I pulled out my HD DVD and fired the A35 up. And as I thought I remembered, it looks/sounds fantastic in my opinion.
Now admittedly I don't have the BD release, nor have I seen it, but if it is as awful as many here say, then a remaster is called for. But I almost find it hard to believe it is as bad as people say after reading those same people saying the HD DVD version is "horrid". However I will admit that another titled mentioned, at least on HD DVD, could be better and that is 'Face Off'. I can only hope that the BD would look better.
All of this, to me, is really moot because if/when I do finally get into BD I won't be buying what I already have on HD DVD. And I am not here advocating one format over the other. But I did want to comment on what I see and ask what I may be missing because these posts just don't make a whole lot of sense to me.